Criticizing the government, which hold the election in a bitter way, is a common thing. And all these criticisms come from the rival candidates and their fans. Meanwhile it is obvious that the goal of disapprovals is absorbing the attention of voters, but it makes the government to react sometimes, severely.
Although this process looks ordinary, these days we are facing with a great deal of critiques which seem unfair and unbalanced. The ninth government has had some week and some strong points, as all other governments did. But is it not unfair to ignore all its strong points, specially its inclination to people, revolutionary values, struggling with enemies, finalizing the scientific and investigative projects?
If some of Ahmadi Nezhad's criticizers, say his performance is ruining the whole revolution's achievements in 27 years, aren't they included to the same critique that are denying all the revolution's services during the past four years?
Even if they want to get the attention of the voters by these sober critiques, they should consider this fact that the audience will believe them better if they say some good aspects of their rivals, because it makes their statements more acceptable.
